If the tenant wants to enforce the break clause, the minimum termination required must be clearly defined in the break clause (1 month`s notice is normal). In addition, certain conditions may be related to the clause that must be met. It may, for example, require the tenant to have paid the full rent owed before the break clause can be used. You did not say whether it was a common or one-time lease. If a common tenancy agreement, then all common tenants must agree to end an early rent, including the exercise of a break clause. Owners think they can write any old crap in a lease, but that doesn`t make it valid or enforceable. You don`t know what you mean by «pay the break clause,» because a break clause only says when you can leave. Thank you for all your advice! I really appreciate it. It is very likely that we will accept the two-month break clause.

If you think you can get professional advice to terminate a lease – if you want to get a break clause or if you have problems with the withdrawal of a tenant, you can get free legal advice from LegalforLandlords (100% no bonds). My landlord tells me that I have to pay for the 6 months (until a new tenant is found) – the 500 pounds and it must be up to the 1st of a month. What I see is that we have an early termination clause that I do not have to pay more than my notice. The 1.1 is also mentioned, the 1st of a month with the end of the contract or after, not to terminate before. In addition, claiming the 500-pound tax for «re-marketing fees, cavities, etc.» seems a bit high, as stated in previous comments «You can be available for free on sites like OpenRent advertisements». Regardless of what the tenant says, it is your landlord who is responsible for the restitution of the deposit, it should have been an inventory at the beginning of the rent, and I would insist on one if you leave, because otherwise you could be kept for the damage he does to the property. I just want you to see the difference between a break clause and a termination clause. For example, an owner may give you a one-year contract without a break clause and tell you that you must tell them for 2 months of your intention to terminate the contract. Such an agreement would not be applicable, since the contract expires anyway at the end of the period.

Such conditions are usually in place, so a landlord can receive an appropriate notification to get a new tenant and, of course, it is advisable to know a landlord if you wish to stay. However, for a new lease (no unilateral renewal), they must issue new IPs, note that IP is not confirmation of the deposit company, but a separate notice containing all the information about the lease. This is different from the initial rent at least in the start time. As a general rule, a tenant cannot terminate before the fixed term expires, except (a) under a breach clause in the contract or (b) with the agreement of the lessor, in which he can obtain conditions acceptable to both parties. We rented a property for a 9-month contract. We had to leave the house for personal reasons in 4 months. Contacted owner and he was not ready to rent the property and wanted us to pay the break clause. We paid the rent and bills paid, including the communal tax for the remainder of 5 months. Now without informing us owner has approved the property. Is that legal? For a tenancy agreement that began after October 1, 2015, when the original deposit was protected on time and PI was issued on time, it is deemed to be served if the lease becomes ZuSPT, i.e. when the lease expires and the tenants remain in ownership. The lessor is required to give the tenant at least two months if he wishes to enforce the break clause by communing a notification to point 21.